We have lots of people fighting for something all around the world. I was thinking about this for a while now I’ve arrived on my own position about this. That’s a hypothesis based on a few axioms I’ll be verifying in the nearest future.
- I fight for the future of all the people(call that humanity?), not ordinary structures(e.g. America, Iraq, Russia, Novorussia, Ukraine, whatever)
- I can be influenced by propaganda, thus relying even on my perceptions of the situation is not something wise
- Winning is a consequence of long term strategic thinking, not a matter of tactical advantage
- Killing people is not an efficient long term strategy for me, converting people is
Just imagine the difference between dealing with N more pissed people rather than with N more(even partially) converted ones.
Step 1: Boost learning by being open
Iterative methodologies proved their worth in modern world. Scrum and kanban are taking over even the most conservative parts of the companies life – finance planning. Building an agile feedback loop is important to react quickly to the changing world, but it’s even more important to speedup the learning which leads to strategic advantages.
Openness has been one of my core values for a long. I guess consciously I arrived by that somewhere in 2012. Since that time I realized that apart from being a thing I just like, it’s an awesome way to get feedback on my thoughts quicker.
Note: I still don’t think that sharing my dietary habits on e.g. Instagram has good signal-to-noise ratio, so this should be applied consciously.
More feedback –> better learning –> improved strategies.
Step 2: Transform the battlefield by sharing stuff
Head-full attacks do not work well. Storming a fortification requires 3 to 5 times more resources than defending that.
Plus, it’s always tricky to understand if we’re storming/defending the right fortification in the information space. And what to storm in your mind if you’re not defending a thing? : )
Sharing stuff you like works differently. In places where there’s a need for it, it will be accepted without any battles.
Basically, propaganda works like this: “You’re different”. Now we have induced differences and the whole information front separating us.
- Saying ‘I agree’ with it means you’re on ‘positive’ side of the induced effect
- Saying ‘I disagree’ means you’re on ‘negative side of the induced effect and you still support the whole machine
- Not minding it and working on your own strategy is the thing which kinda works to your own advantage and moves you closer to the bright future you imagine
Unity is my future. What do you imagine?
I’m buying portable projector and will be sharing the awesome ideas I’ve seen. And let the people choose what they’d like to see around.